The objective of this study through this

Article is, in addition to addressing the sanctions set out in law no. which deals with acts of administrative improbity, it is also to bring to society’s light the pros and cons of said law – also appearing in the its core – the concepts of administrative morality, since, as it is a diffuse concept – and is closely linked to probity, it is still the subject of great doubt in the social environment. It is noteworthy that despite the gaps left by the administrative improbity law, it also brought a substantial advance in the control of public administration, its legal candidates, managed to recover part of the resources diverted through corruption, whether practiced through damage to the public treasury or illicit enrichment, thus mitigating the damage caused. It is important to emphasize, however, that the nature of administrative improbity crimes is civil and not criminal. Keywords : Improbity, Sanction, Advancement.

The direct constitutional basis for liability

For acts of administrative improbity is based on  art.  of the  federative constitution. To corroborate the infamous Magna Carta, Law No.  was created, which legislates on acts of administrative improbity, such as: why it occurs, how it occurs, its subjects (passive and active) and the role of the public prosecutor Furniture and Fixtures Manufacturers Email List as well as the sanctions to be applied. The scope of this article will also include those who, even though they are not public agents, induce or contribute to the practice of the act of improbity or benefit from it in any way, directly or indirectly. In this sense, those responsible and employees of legal entities governed by private law that receive public funds and promote their diversion, appropriation, or use in non-compliance with the purposes for which granted the transfer.

It will be clarified that the Public

Administration does not exercise its activities and rights with the same autonomy Aero Leads  and freedom with which private individuals exercise theirs. It will also be seen that the provisions of this law reach all people qualified as public agents, in direct, indirect and foundational administration, even if temporarily, with or without remuneration; and also, companies incorporated into public assets and entities for the creation or funding of the treasury that have competed or compete with more than 50% of the assets or annual revenue. Finally, the four groups that incur acts of administrative improbity will now be analyzed, whether they are: Illegal enrichment; Damage or loss to the treasury, Granting or improper application of financial or tax benefits and those that violate the principles of public administration.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *